PCB Holder: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
K (Änderungen von Djaeger (Diskussion) wurden auf die letzte Version von OSEG zurückgesetzt) (Markierung: Zurücksetzung) |
|||
Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
{{Projekt | {{Projekt | ||
|Images={{ProjektImages | |Images={{ProjektImages | ||
− | |projectimage=PCB Holder | + | |projectimage=PCB Holder |
− | |||
− | |||
}} | }} | ||
|subcat=Computer, electronics | |subcat=Computer, electronics | ||
Zeile 36: | Zeile 34: | ||
|matspec=ISO 4014 - M8 x 40 | |matspec=ISO 4014 - M8 x 40 | ||
|matquantity=1 | |matquantity=1 | ||
− | |||
}}{{ProjektMaterials | }}{{ProjektMaterials | ||
|matpartnumber=5 | |matpartnumber=5 | ||
Zeile 72: | Zeile 69: | ||
|matspec=ISO 4017 - M5 x 10 | |matspec=ISO 4017 - M5 x 10 | ||
|matquantity=1 | |matquantity=1 | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
}} | }} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
}} | }} |
Version vom 10. März 2020, 09:08 Uhr
300px |
PCB Holder Basic Data Category: Computer, electronics Keywords: PCB Holder
no no no
Other
Design files are in original format: No Free redistribution is allowed licence: No
|
Inhaltsverzeichnis
[Verbergen]Description
PCB Holder used for brazing Search Printed circuit boards
Technical documentation
PCB Holder technical drawings | |
Files: |
+ General Reviews
7
Part number 12 -- Djaeger (Diskussion) 20:16, 9. Mär. 2020 (CET)
cold you add part numbers in the text area of the drawings?
Part number 12 -- Micha (Diskussion) 21:15, 24. Apr. 2020 (CEST)
Does the general tolerance of "medium" make sense for additive manufactured components? Seems unrealistic for most of the printers. Nozzle diameter between 0.25 - 0.8 mm for regular printers
Part number 12 -- Micha (Diskussion) 22:30, 24. Apr. 2020 (CEST)
position numbers in assembly drawings should be at the edges of the drawing in a horizontal or vertical line.
Part number 12 -- Micha (Diskussion) 22:57, 24. Apr. 2020 (CEST)
description of funcion, overall dimensions, weight and maximum space between brackets are missing.
Assembly instructions -- Djaeger (Diskussion) 15:54, 28. Apr. 2020 (CEST)
this is a test review
Re: Test01 -- Djaeger (Diskussion) 15:55, 28. Apr. 2020 (CEST)
reply 1
Re: Test01 -- Djaeger (Diskussion) 15:56, 28. Apr. 2020 (CEST)
reply02
Parts list
Part number | Pos No. | Code | Part Type | Part Name | Specifications | Quantity | Review Status | Show All Comments | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 01.01 | arm | 2 | ![]() |
|||||
Part number 1 -- Djaeger (Diskussion) 18:50, 9. Mär. 2020 (CET)in some details the drawings would be easier to understand if different line widths were used ![]() Re: Part number 1 -- OSEG (Diskussion) 09:13, 10. Mär. 2020 (CET)
Re: Re: Part number 1 -- Djaeger (Diskussion) 09:34, 10. Mär. 2020 (CET)just the contour of the parts a bit thicker Part number 1 -- Djaeger (Diskussion) 18:59, 9. Mär. 2020 (CET)but this is of course only optional ;-) Part number 1 -- Djaeger (Diskussion) 19:20, 9. Mär. 2020 (CET)is there a stl-file for 3D printer? Re: Part number 1 -- OSEG (Diskussion) 09:16, 10. Mär. 2020 (CET)
Part number 1 -- Djaeger (Diskussion) 19:22, 9. Mär. 2020 (CET)Are plastics other than PLA - EN-13432 permitted? Part number 1 -- Djaeger (Diskussion) 19:24, 9. Mär. 2020 (CET)Position number for left arm and bracket missing in http://test.oho.wiki/images/9/99/01.00_PCB_HOLDER.pdf Re: Part number 1 -- OSEG (Diskussion) 09:18, 10. Mär. 2020 (CET)
Part number 1 -- Djaeger (Diskussion) 19:27, 9. Mär. 2020 (CET)in the BOM the two arms (Part Number 1) are identic, in the drawing they seem not to be identic, or am I wromg? Re: Part number 1 -- OSEG (Diskussion) 09:19, 10. Mär. 2020 (CET)
Part number 1 -- OSEG (Diskussion) 12:06, 13. Apr. 2020 (CEST)The drawing seems very overloaded, maybe you could move some dimensions to the perspective to the lower left. Part number 1 -- Lukas (Diskussion) 21:39, 24. Apr. 2020 (CEST)
Part number 1 -- Micha (Diskussion) 21:39, 24. Apr. 2020 (CEST)The designed space for the nuts (7) should be bigger. Due to tolerances it's not certain the nuts fit. Part number 1 -- Lukas (Diskussion) 21:43, 24. Apr. 2020 (CEST)Alle Durchgangslöcher auf NORM DIN EN 20273 prüfen. 5,2 ist zum Beispiel zu eng. |
|||||||||
2 | 01.02 | bracket | 2 | ![]() |
|||||
Part number 2 -- Djaeger (Diskussion) 19:30, 9. Mär. 2020 (CET)see comments en Part Number 1 Part number 2 -- Lukas (Diskussion) 21:14, 24. Apr. 2020 (CEST)M8 - Durchgangslöcher müssen mindestens einen Durchmesser von 8,4mm haben. (fein) DIN EN 20273 Für 3D-gedruckte Teile ist wahrscheinlich mittel (=9mm) oder sogar grob (=10mm) besser. Part number 2 -- Lukas (Diskussion) 21:26, 24. Apr. 2020 (CEST)Die Aufnahme für die Mutter ist mit genau 13mm zu eng, weil der 3D-Drucker auch noch Toleranzen hat. Also mindestens 13,5 mm. Muss ja nicht genau passen. |
|||||||||
3 | track | 1 | ![]() |
||||||
Part number 3 -- Djaeger (Diskussion) 18:36, 9. Mär. 2020 (CET)what material should the track be made of, what are its dimensions? Part number 3 -- Djaeger (Diskussion) 19:39, 9. Mär. 2020 (CET)at least make recomendations e.g. if it has to be metal, which length you would recommend (min-max), if there are standard sizes for PCB etc. Re: Part number 3 -- Lukas (Diskussion) 22:04, 24. Apr. 2020 (CEST)There needs to be a technical drawing if it is not a standard part. |
|||||||||
4 | hexagon bolt | ISO 4014 - M8 x 40 | 1 | ![]() |
|||||
5 | hexagon bolt | ISO 10511 - M8 | 4 | ![]() |
|||||
Part number 5 -- Djaeger (Diskussion) 19:34, 9. Mär. 2020 (CET)is this a bolt or a nut? Re: Part number 5 -- OSEG (Diskussion) 13:42, 10. Mär. 2020 (CET)
Re: Re: Part number 5 -- Micha (Diskussion) 22:09, 24. Apr. 2020 (CEST)needs to be changed in BOM |
|||||||||
6 | flat washer | DIN 125-1 - B 8,4 | 5 | ![]() |
|||||
7 | hexagon bolt | ISO 4032 - M5 , Typ 1 - Produktklasse A und B | 3 | ![]() |
|||||
Part number 7 -- Djaeger (Diskussion) 19:34, 9. Mär. 2020 (CET)is this a bolt or a nut? Re: Part number 7 -- OSEG (Diskussion) 09:24, 10. Mär. 2020 (CET)
Re: Re: Part number 7 -- Martin (Diskussion) 15:33, 24. Apr. 2020 (CEST)
Part number 7 -- Micha (Diskussion) 21:16, 24. Apr. 2020 (CEST)Needs to be changed in BOM as well. |
|||||||||
8 | hexagon bolt | ISO 4017 - M5 x 20 | 3 | ![]() |
|||||
9 | hexagon bolt | ISO 4014 - M8 x 60 | 1 | ![]() |
|||||
10 | compression spring | VD_090W_02_1 STEP AP214 | 1 | ![]() |
|||||
Part number 10 -- Micha (Diskussion) 22:25, 24. Apr. 2020 (CEST)what kind of specification is this? Why not DIN standard? |
|||||||||
11 | hexagon bolt | ISO 4017 - M5 x 10 | 1 | ![]() |
|||||
Part number 11 -- Micha (Diskussion) 22:17, 24. Apr. 2020 (CEST)bolt |