Diskussion:Corn mill: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Bjoern (Diskussion | Beiträge) (→Re: Part number 1.1 -- Bjoern (Diskussion) 09:05, 3. Jun. 2020 (CEST)) |
Bjoern (Diskussion | Beiträge) (Neuer Abschnitt →Part number 1.2 -- ~~~~) |
||
Zeile 62: | Zeile 62: | ||
Specification of the material is missing | Specification of the material is missing | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Part number 1.2 -- [[Benutzer:Bjoern|Bjoern]] ([[Benutzer Diskussion:Bjoern|Diskussion]]) 09:08, 3. Jun. 2020 (CEST) == | ||
+ | |||
+ | symmetry lines and material is missing |
Version vom 3. Juni 2020, 09:08 Uhr
Inhaltsverzeichnis
- 1 Part number 1.1 -- Dietrich-reviewer (Diskussion) 17:04, 1. Mai 2020 (CEST)
- 2 Part number 2.4 -- Dietrich-reviewer (Diskussion) 17:19, 1. Mai 2020 (CEST)
- 3 Part number 2.3 -- Dietrich-reviewer (Diskussion) 17:25, 1. Mai 2020 (CEST)
- 4 Part number 3.1 -- Dietrich-reviewer (Diskussion) 17:27, 1. Mai 2020 (CEST)
- 5 Part number 3.8 -- Dietrich-reviewer (Diskussion) 17:37, 1. Mai 2020 (CEST)
- 6 Part number 4.9 -- Dietrich-reviewer (Diskussion) 17:48, 1. Mai 2020 (CEST)
- 7 Part number 5 -- Dietrich-reviewer (Diskussion) 17:51, 1. Mai 2020 (CEST)
- 8 Part number 1.1 -- Bjoern (Diskussion) 09:04, 3. Jun. 2020 (CEST)
- 9 Part number 1.2 -- Bjoern (Diskussion) 09:08, 3. Jun. 2020 (CEST)
Part number 1.1 -- Dietrich-reviewer (Diskussion) 17:04, 1. Mai 2020 (CEST)
the distance from the holes to the beginning or end of frame 2 is missing
Re: Part number 1.1 -- Bjoern (Diskussion) 09:05, 3. Jun. 2020 (CEST)
Part number 2.4 -- Dietrich-reviewer (Diskussion) 17:19, 1. Mai 2020 (CEST)
plan is missing
Part number 2.3 -- Dietrich-reviewer (Diskussion) 17:25, 1. Mai 2020 (CEST)
there is a wrong plan witout meausres
Re: Part number 2.3 -- Djaeger (Diskussion) 18:01, 1. Mai 2020 (CEST)
I changed the wrong plan for the right plan
Part number 3.1 -- Dietrich-reviewer (Diskussion) 17:27, 1. Mai 2020 (CEST)
this plan is showing the assemby of the whole Pulley Disc >>> sorry, I checked it again, tha plan is right
Re: Part number 3.1 -- Djaeger (Diskussion) 18:02, 1. Mai 2020 (CEST)
ok, perfect
Part number 3.8 -- Dietrich-reviewer (Diskussion) 17:37, 1. Mai 2020 (CEST)
I think it is easier and cheaper to buy this part insteaad producing it, did you try to buy it?
Re: Part number 3.8 -- Djaeger (Diskussion) 18:04, 1. Mai 2020 (CEST)
I tried but i did not find what I need
Re: Re: Part number 3.8 -- Dietrich-reviewer (Diskussion) 18:05, 1. Mai 2020 (CEST)
I tried to find it, I think this can fit: https://www.ebay.de/itm/Keilriemen-scheibe-2-rillig-Riemenscheibe-Welle-20-00-mm/273642320244 - what do you think?
Part number 4.9 -- Dietrich-reviewer (Diskussion) 17:48, 1. Mai 2020 (CEST)
plan is missing
Re: Part number 4.9 -- Djaeger (Diskussion) 18:07, 1. Mai 2020 (CEST)
sorry but this is wrong, I will check too where to get ...
Part number 5 -- Dietrich-reviewer (Diskussion) 17:51, 1. Mai 2020 (CEST)
I found this: https://de.rs-online.com/web/p/scharniere/2702758
is it ok?
Re: Part number 5 -- Djaeger (Diskussion) 18:08, 1. Mai 2020 (CEST)
sorry but this is wrong, I will check too where to get ...
Part number 1.1 -- Bjoern (Diskussion) 09:04, 3. Jun. 2020 (CEST)
Specification of the material is missing
Part number 1.2 -- Bjoern (Diskussion) 09:08, 3. Jun. 2020 (CEST)
symmetry lines and material is missing