Diskussion:COSI Measure

Part number 1 -- OSEG (Diskussion) 11:06, 13. Apr. 2020 (CEST)

Hier konnte ich als OSEG, den Review Status nicht ändern. (Lukas)

Re: Part number 1 -- Robert (Diskussion) 14:53, 26. Apr. 2020 (CEST)

Ich konntes den Review-Status auch nicht ändern. Wie wird man eigtl. Reviewer, bzw. bin ich schon einer?

Part number 1 -- Micha (Diskussion) 23:15, 24. Apr. 2020 (CEST)

All technical drawings are inadequate. Things to consider :Symmetry, accuracy of dimensions(decimal place), to many dimensions given(Überbemaßung), dimensioning suitable for production, deminsioning of sinks, details following a norm(DIN, ISO), summarisation of equal features (e.g. 16x M6), missing tolerances and so on.

Part number 1 -- Lukas (Diskussion) 23:23, 24. Apr. 2020 (CEST)

Assembly Instructions:

• Upload as PDF as well
• Steps should have a proper name
• Tabels too big, pictures too small
• Hard to review

Part number 1 -- Micha (Diskussion) 23:26, 24. Apr. 2020 (CEST)

CAD files are missing(stp).

Re: Part number 1 -- Robert (Diskussion) 14:55, 26. Apr. 2020 (CEST)

Replace this text with your reply

I first thought that only the references to the drawings were missing... Both, drawings and references in the BOM should be provided.

Part number 1 -- Robert (Diskussion) 14:51, 26. Apr. 2020 (CEST)

The links to the vendors are not sufficient to describe the parts. Prices and vendor links are only optional because Once the links become obsolete, the whole documentation is practically useless. Basic information like original drawings or specification for bought parts are needed instead.

The same applies to the remaining postitions of this BOM.

Part number 1 -- Robert (Diskussion) 15:16, 26. Apr. 2020 (CEST)

@Dietrich: The option to delete my comment would be nice.