Cookies helfen uns bei der Bereitstellung von Open Source Ecology (OSE) Germany - Entwicklungsplattform. Durch die Nutzung von Open Source Ecology (OSE) Germany - Entwicklungsplattform erklärst du dich damit einverstanden, dass wir Cookies speichern.

Diskussion:COSI Measure: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Open Source Ecology (OSE) Germany - Entwicklungsplattform
Wechseln zu:Navigation, Suche
(Neuer Abschnitt Part number 2 -- ~~~~)
(Part number 2 -- Robert (Diskussion) 14:57, 26. Apr. 2020 (CEST))
Zeile 36: Zeile 36:
  
 
The links to the vendors are not sufficient to describe the parts. Once the links become obsolete, the whole documentation is practically useless.
 
The links to the vendors are not sufficient to describe the parts. Once the links become obsolete, the whole documentation is practically useless.
 +
 +
===Re: Part number 2 -- [[Benutzer:Robert|Robert]] ([[Benutzer Diskussion:Robert|Diskussion]]) 14:58, 26. Apr. 2020 (CEST)===
 +
 +
: Replace this text with your reply
 +
The same applies to the remaining postitions of this BOM.

Version vom 26. April 2020, 14:58 Uhr

Part number 1 -- OSEG (Diskussion) 11:06, 13. Apr. 2020 (CEST)

Hier konnte ich als OSEG, den Review Status nicht ändern. (Lukas)

Re: Part number 1 -- Robert (Diskussion) 14:53, 26. Apr. 2020 (CEST)

Replace this text with your reply

Ich konntes den Review-Status auch nicht ändern. Wie wird man eigtl. Reviewer, bzw. bin ich schon einer?

Part number 1 -- Micha (Diskussion) 23:15, 24. Apr. 2020 (CEST)

All technical drawings are inadequate. Things to consider :Symmetry, accuracy of dimensions(decimal place), to many dimensions given(Überbemaßung), dimensioning suitable for production, deminsioning of sinks, details following a norm(DIN, ISO), summarisation of equal features (e.g. 16x M6), missing tolerances and so on.

Part number 1 -- Lukas (Diskussion) 23:23, 24. Apr. 2020 (CEST)

Assembly Instructions:

  • Upload as PDF as well
  • Steps should have a proper name
  • Tabels too big, pictures too small
  • Hard to review

Part number 1 -- Micha (Diskussion) 23:26, 24. Apr. 2020 (CEST)

CAD files are missing(stp).

Re: Part number 1 -- Robert (Diskussion) 14:55, 26. Apr. 2020 (CEST)

Replace this text with your reply

I first thought that only the references to the drawings were missing... Both, drawings and references in the BOM should be provided.

Part number 1 -- Robert (Diskussion) 14:51, 26. Apr. 2020 (CEST)

The profile price is 21.5 EUR per meter and needs to be corrected.

Part number 2 -- Robert (Diskussion) 14:57, 26. Apr. 2020 (CEST)

The links to the vendors are not sufficient to describe the parts. Once the links become obsolete, the whole documentation is practically useless.

Re: Part number 2 -- Robert (Diskussion) 14:58, 26. Apr. 2020 (CEST)

Replace this text with your reply

The same applies to the remaining postitions of this BOM.

CC 2019 open hardware observatory
|
  • Impressum
  • |
  • Legal