Diskussion:Cosi measure new

Part number 5.2.5 -- Micha (Diskussion) 20:50, 8. Mai 2020 (CEST)

Test

Part number 1 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:16, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

Is there an assembly instruction/drawing somewhere?

Part number 1.5 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:24, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

part number is a duplicate

Part number 1.7 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:27, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 10642 (2020-02-00)

Part number 1.10 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:34, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 4762 (2004-06-00)

Part number 1.16 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:38, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

nominal length missing

Part number 1.17 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:39, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 4762 (2004-06-00)

Part number 1.18 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:45, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 10642

Part number 1.19 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:46, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 4762 (2004-06-00)

Part number 1.20 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:47, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 10642

Part number 1.21 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:50, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 4032 (2013-04-00)

Part number 1.23 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:51, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

not a standard part

Part number 1.24 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:52, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 4762 (2004-06-00)

Part number 1.25 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:53, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

that's a standard part :)

Part number 1.25 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:54, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 4032 (2013-04-00)

Part number 2.1 -- Martin (Diskussion) 19:10, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

approved from my perspective; just some comments:

• avoid "chain dimensioning" and refer to and a reference point/edge so measure tolerances don't add up when making these holes
• hole positions are a little confusing :)
• no tolerance class defined (I suggest "m" according to DIN ISO 2768-1), but also not crucial for this piece of hardware

Part number 2.2 -- Martin (Diskussion) 19:18, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

approved from my perspective; just some comments:

• dividing line between both rectangle parts makes no sense
• a note that all holes are ø5,5mm would be sufficient (BTW one in the lower row of holes is technically not defined :) )
• cross out "optional", technical drawings are there to create exact replicates of a thing (within the defined tolerances)
• no tolerance class defined (I suggest "m" according to DIN ISO 2768-1), but also not crucial for this piece of hardware

Part number 2.3 -- Martin (Diskussion) 19:24, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

Approved from my perspective, but please clarify, that these ø16mm circles missing are the the countersinks (which weren't defined in 2.1 or 2.2)

& define what kind of countersink you mean (I assume 16x90°)

--

Nice tutorial for referencing holes/threads etc. (after US standards): https://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/mindworks/Solidworks/Topic%20References/DrawingGuidelines.pdf

Part number 2.5 -- Martin (Diskussion) 19:31, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

width of the small rectangle is missing (I assume it's 40mm)

Part number 2.5 -- Martin (Diskussion) 19:34, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

just some comments:

• please clarify countersinks; ø12mm circles can be omitted when you reference them e.g. like 12x90°) (see these pictures as example)
• detailed view is unnecessary
• dividing line between both rectangles makes no sense

Part number 2.7 -- Martin (Diskussion) 19:58, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

thread of left hole is undefined (for now it's just a hole)

→ omit the detail view and reference the holes with M5 x 20mm

Part number 2.8 -- Martin (Diskussion) 20:00, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

approved from my perspective, but please remove the optional part, technical drawings are there to create exact replicates of a thing (within the defined tolerances)

Part number 2.9 -- Martin (Diskussion) 20:01, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

approved from my perspective, but please remove the optional part, technical drawings are there to create exact replicates of a thing (within the defined tolerances)

Part number 3 -- Martin (Diskussion) 20:03, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

all "PDFs" link to STL files :)

Part number 5.4.29 -- Martin (Diskussion) 21:37, 16. Mai 2020 (CEST)

that's a standard part

Part number 5.4.19 -- Martin (Diskussion) 21:39, 16. Mai 2020 (CEST)

that's a standard part