Cosi measure new

	Cosi measure new Basic Data Category: Medical equipment URL (first publication): www.opensourceimaging.org Keywords: 3D Multipurpose Measurement System, Open Source Imaging Translation status: 4-Manual Translation Technical documentation Assembly instructions are published: Yes Bill of materials is published: Yes Contributing guide is published: No Mechanical hardware Contains original mechanical hardware: Yes Public CAD repository for mechanical hardware: https://github.com/opensourceimaging/cosi-measure/tree/master/Mechanical%20System CAD Format: FCSTD License for mechanical hardware: CERN Open Hardware License Electronic hardware Contains original electronic hardware: Yes Public CAD repository for electronic hardware: https://github.com/opensourceimaging/cosi-measure Electronic License: CERN Open Hardware License yes yes yes Other Contains original software: Yes Assembly instructions are editable: Yes Bill of materials is editable: Yes Design files are in original format: Yes Free redistribution is allowed licence: No Project management Issue Management System: https://github.com/opensourceimaging/cosi-measure Versioning System:https://github.com/opensourceimaging/cosi-measure

Inhaltsverzeichnis

[Verbergen]

1 Description
2 Technical documentation
- 2.1
3 + General Reviews
4 Parts list

Description

COSI Measure is an Open Source 3D Multipurpose Measurement System with submillimetre

fidelity. The documentation for the hardware and the software is made freely available to the community. Contact person for the project: Lukas Winter (lukas.winter@ptb.de)

Technical documentation

+ General Reviews 60

Part number 5.2.5 -- Micha (Diskussion) 20:50, 8. Mai 2020 (CEST)

Test

Part number 1 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:16, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

Is there an assembly instruction/drawing somewhere?

Part number 1.5 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:24, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

part number is a duplicate

Part number 1.7 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:27, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 10642 (2020-02-00)

Part number 1.10 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:34, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 4762 (2004-06-00)

Part number 1.16 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:38, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

nominal length missing

Part number 1.17 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:39, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 4762 (2004-06-00)

Part number 1.18 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:45, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 10642

Part number 1.19 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:46, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 4762 (2004-06-00)

Part number 1.20 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:47, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 10642

Part number 1.21 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:50, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 4032 (2013-04-00)

Part number 1.23 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:51, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

not a standard part

Part number 1.24 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:52, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 4762 (2004-06-00)

Part number 1.25 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:53, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

that's a standard part :)

Part number 1.25 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:54, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 4032 (2013-04-00)

Part number 2.1 -- Martin (Diskussion) 19:10, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

approved from my perspective; just some comments:

avoid "chain dimensioning" and refer to and a reference point/edge so measure tolerances don't add up when making these holes
hole positions are a little confusing :)
no tolerance class defined (I suggest "m" according to DIN ISO 2768-1), but also not crucial for this piece of hardware

Part number 2.2 -- Martin (Diskussion) 19:18, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

approved from my perspective; just some comments:

dividing line between both rectangle parts makes no sense
a note that all holes are ø5,5mm would be sufficient (BTW one in the lower row of holes is technically not defined :) )
cross out "optional", technical drawings are there to create exact replicates of a thing (within the defined tolerances)
no tolerance class defined (I suggest "m" according to DIN ISO 2768-1), but also not crucial for this piece of hardware

Part number 2.3 -- Martin (Diskussion) 19:24, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

Approved from my perspective, but please clarify, that these ø16mm circles missing are the the countersinks (which weren't defined in 2.1 or 2.2)

& define what kind of countersink you mean (I assume 16x90°)

--

Nice tutorial for referencing holes/threads etc. (after US standards): https://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/mindworks/Solidworks/Topic%20References/DrawingGuidelines.pdf

Part number 2.5 -- Martin (Diskussion) 19:31, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

width of the small rectangle is missing (I assume it's 40mm)

Part number 2.5 -- Martin (Diskussion) 19:34, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

just some comments:

please clarify countersinks; ø12mm circles can be omitted when you reference them e.g. like 12x90°) (see these pictures as example)
detailed view is unnecessary
dividing line between both rectangles makes no sense

Part number 2.7 -- Martin (Diskussion) 19:58, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

thread of left hole is undefined (for now it's just a hole)

→ omit the detail view and reference the holes with M5 x 20mm

Part number 2.8 -- Martin (Diskussion) 20:00, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

approved from my perspective, but please remove the optional part, technical drawings are there to create exact replicates of a thing (within the defined tolerances)

Part number 2.9 -- Martin (Diskussion) 20:01, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

approved from my perspective, but please remove the optional part, technical drawings are there to create exact replicates of a thing (within the defined tolerances)

Part number 3 -- Martin (Diskussion) 20:03, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

all "PDFs" link to STL files :)

Part number 5.4.19 -- Martin (Diskussion) 21:39, 16. Mai 2020 (CEST)

that's a standard part

Part number 5.4.13 -- Martin (Diskussion) 21:40, 16. Mai 2020 (CEST)

that's a standard part

Part number 3.9 -- Martin (Diskussion) 21:41, 16. Mai 2020 (CEST)

Export file missing

Re: Part number 3.9 -- Micha (Diskussion) 11:28, 8. Jun. 2020 (CEST)

stl file missing but can be produced from step file

Part number 5.0.1 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 18:12, 24. Mai 2020 (CEST)

the assembly file need more details about the connection between the limit switches and power management board and BeBoPr++ ,(pin to pin connection ) specially from power management board to BeBoPr++ .

Part number 5.1.5 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 18:23, 24. Mai 2020 (CEST)

need more information for how to buy

Part number 5.1.6 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 18:27, 24. Mai 2020 (CEST)

the link is not working

Part number 5.1.12 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 18:37, 24. Mai 2020 (CEST)

need more information for search and buy in internet.

Part number 5.1.15 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 18:42, 24. Mai 2020 (CEST)

quantity is missing

Part number 5.1.16 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 18:43, 24. Mai 2020 (CEST)

quantity is missing

Part number 5.1.17 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 18:43, 24. Mai 2020 (CEST)

quantity is missing

Part number 5.1.18 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 18:43, 24. Mai 2020 (CEST)

quantity is missing

Part number 5.2.2 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 17:36, 25. Mai 2020 (CEST)

for test

Part number 5.2 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 17:36, 25. Mai 2020 (CEST)

for test

Part number 5.2.2 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 22:11, 30. Mai 2020 (CEST)

the information for buying this item is not enough .(package , size , ...)